🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to protect females from violence, including family violence, following prolonged and intense discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in the capital this past week to oppose the decision. The ultimate decision now lies with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring governments to establish laws and support services to eliminate all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a move that rights groups characterized as a major regression for women's rights.

Political Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its emphasis on gender equality undermines traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a move proposed by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the primary political groups advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent decision has sparked widespread protest both within the country and internationally.

22,000 individuals have endorsed a national petition calling for the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Potential Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a rash choice fueled by false information. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty four years ago, instances of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority support, the president could possibly return the bill for additional consideration if he holds objections.

President Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to legal requirements, "considering governmental and judicial factors, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout Europe," stated a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in several EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect similar discussions in additional member states