🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial action to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and parents are observing intently to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Trend

Across Europe, a growing number of nations are moving toward similar measures.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that phones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". A law could be enacted next year.
• Norway is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media users. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked parliament to enact a law raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised guardians to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding motion demanding a ban for minors except if guardian approval is granted. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a solid foundation," commented a leading MEP driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Previously, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. However, the government pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after encountering disturbing platform posts argues that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are appropriate and fit for children," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, legislation is primarily happening at the state government level due to national inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a bill barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a rule restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional access dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced laws mandating guardian approval for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and calls from various politicians to follow Australia's example, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Beyond the West, further states are also considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies strike a more measured position. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve safety.

As this global discussion unfolds, the steps of Australia and its followers indicate that policymakers internationally are increasingly prepared to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.